Respirology

Jorine E. Hartman  Karin Klooster  Henk Groen  Nick H.T. ten Hacken  Dirk‐Jan Slebos

Respirology. 2018 Mar 25. doi: 10.1111/resp.13295. [Epub ahead of print]

Background and objective

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using endobronchial valves (EBV) is an effective new treatment option for severe emphysema patients without interlobar collateral ventilation. The objective of this study was to perform an economic evaluation including the costs and cost‐effectiveness of EBV treatment compared with standard medical care (SoC) from the hospital perspective in the short term and long term.

Methods

For the short‐term evaluation, incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated based on the 6‐month end point data from the STELVIO randomized trial. For the long‐term evaluation, a Markov simulation model was constructed based on STELVIO and literature. The clinical outcome data were quality‐adjusted life‐years (QALY) based on the EuroQol5‐Dimensions (EQ5D) questionnaire, the 6‐min walking distance (6MWD) and the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).

Results

The mean difference between the EBV group and controls was €16 721/patient. In the short‐term (6 months), costs per additional QALY was €205 129, the ICER for 6MWD was €160 and for SGRQ was €1241. In the long term, the resulting cost‐effectiveness ratios indicate additional costs of €39 000 per QALY gained with a 5‐year time horizon and €21 500 per QALY gained at 10 years. In comparison, historical costs per additional QALY 1 year after the coil treatment are €738 400, 5 years after lung volume reduction surgery are €48 415 and 15 years after double‐lung transplantation are €29 410.

Conclusion

The positive clinical effects of EBV treatment are associated with increased costs compared with SoC. Our results suggest that the EBV treatment has a favourable cost‐effectiveness profile, also when compared with other treatment modalities for this patient group.

weblink here